You are currently viewing IMF calls for pragmatic measures on subsidies.

IMF calls for pragmatic measures on subsidies.

The International Monetary Fund  ( IMF )  says its research studies have shown that subsidies such as those on fuel benefit more the affluent than the less privileged. 

IMF resident representative Eric Lautier says subsidies are also not good for climate, especially in the current period where Zambia is struggling with drought. 

Mr. Lautier is of the view that  it is unfortunate that large firms, people that are driving large cars, having big houses are all benefiting more from subsidised fuel than less fortunate people.

“Ultimately discussions around subsidies are about discussing on how best to allocate limited resources in an economy. We at the IMF have done a lot of research on fuel subsidies and their welfare impact in developing countries.

“ Past research has shown the richest 20 percent of households benefit more from fuel subsidies, on average by a factor of 6 than the poorest 20 percent. Essentially when you provide something below cost, the more you consume of it the more you benefit from these subsidies.

“ So large firms, people that are driving large cars, having big houses are all benefiting more from subsidised fuel than less fortunate people,” he said. 

Stressing that the cost of subsidies is high thereby impacting budget sustainability,  the IMF country representative added that spending a large share of the budget on fuel subsidies means that a country cannot afford the needed investment to grow the economy and create jobs. 

“But most importantly because it is about resource allocation, you have to look at the cost of these subsidies which are very high and ultimately impact what you can do with the budget,” he said. 

Mr. Lautier  further  highlighted that without the debt restructuring, it would have been difficult for the government to double social spending as a share of GDP, hire more teachers, and health workers, and provide free lunch at school.

“And we have to acknowledge that even though removal of subsidies will benefit the poorest, they are also the less able to absorb some of the additional cost brought by the removal of the subsidy, both through higher energy costs of cooking, heating, lighting, and personal transport and through higher prices for other goods and services, including food,” he said. 

The IMF  has since urged the government to ensure that the support is well calibrated to cushion the impact on people with the lowest real disposable income.

He said it is against this background, the IMF will participate in the Economics Association of Zambia EAZ 2024 Economic Summit on July 25th and 26th at Ciela Resort in Chongwe District, Lusaka, where stakeholders will analyze strategies to navigate the disaster and foster economic resilience. 

The theme of this year’s summit is:  “Pioneering Zambia’s Sustainable Economic Transformation through Climate Change Adaptation and Sustainable Financing Mechanisms after Debt Restructuring.”

This is contained in a statement issued by the Economics Association of Zambia (EAZ) Acting Chief Executive Officer Tendai Posiana.